Cross-Cultural Experiences of Belt and Road Students in Chinese Prefectural Medical Centers: A Mixed-Methods Study
Published 2025-04-30
Keywords
- Belt and Road Initiative,
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation,
- International Students,
- Local Studies
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction The Belt and Road Initiative has increased international student enrollment in China, bringing challenges like diverse student preparedness and cross-cultural adaptation issues. Effective adaptation is essential for students' academic success and mental health, yet limited research exists on medical students' adaptation in China’s prefectural cities. Objectives This study is to examine the levels of cultural adaptation stress, psychological resilience, loneliness, and coping strategies among international medical students studying in clinical medical centers in China, explore the relationships between these factors, and identify the main challenges they face along with their support needs, providing recommendations for future interventions and policies. Design A convergent mixed methods approach was used, with quantitative data collected via “Questionnaire Star” using scales for Cultural Adaptation Stress, Psychological Resilience, Loneliness, and Coping Style. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured focus groups, analyzed thematically. Methods The study was conducted in a medical center in a prefectural city in Sichuan, China, recruiting 25 international students for surveys and 20 for focus groups. Results Mean scores for Acculturative Stress, Resilience, Loneliness, and Coping were 127.4 ± 17.8, 70.0 ± 12.2, 46.2 ± 6.1, and 144.7 ± 15.9, respectively. Coping correlated positively with resilience (r = 0.464, P < 0.05) and negatively with loneliness (r = -0.450, P < 0.05). Four themes emerged: motivations for studying in China, cross-cultural experiences, challenges, and training needs. Conclusion Students from Belt and Road Initiative countries face adaptation challenges in China. Enhancing coping strategies and providing targeted support may improve their cross-cultural adaptation and well-being.
References
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, 843-860.
- Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. (2018)
- Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003b). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. (2018)
- Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill Companies.
- Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE Publications.
- Egitim, S., & Akaliyski, P. (2024). Intercultural experience facilitates majority-group acculturation through ethnocultural empathy: Evidence from a mixed-methods investigation in Japan. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 98, 101908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101908
- Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
- Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
- Mtombeni, K., Hazell, L., & Mokoena, L. (2024). Diagnostic radiographers' perceptions of professional identity in Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa. Journal of medical radiation sciences, 71(1), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.737
- Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8500900505
- Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
- Salarvand, S., Farzanpour, F., & Gharaei, H. A. (2024). The effect of personalized mobile health (mHealth) in cardiac rehabilitation for discharged elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction on their inner strength and resilience. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 24(1). PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03791-5
- Sandhu, D. S., & Asrabadi, B. R. (1994). Development of an acculturative stress scale for international students: Preliminary findings. Psychological Reports, 75(1), 435–448. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.435
- Sanci, L., Williams, I., Russell, M., Chondros, P., Duncan, A.-M., Tarzia, L., Peter, D., Lim, M. S. Y., Tomyn, A., & Minas, H. (2022). Towards a health promoting university: Descriptive findings on health, wellbeing and academic performance amongst university students in Australia. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14690-9
- Sharif-Nia, H., Sánchez-Teruel, D., Sivarajan Froelicher, E., Hejazi, S., Hosseini, L., Khoshnavay Fomani, F., Moshtagh, M., Mollaei, F., Goudarzian, A. H., & Babaei, A. (2024). Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: A systematic review psychometrics properties using the COSMIN. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 86(5), 2976–2991. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000001968
- Shih, L., & Cao, W. (2022). The impact of the “Belt and Road Initiative” on international