Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): August 2026
Articles

Multidimensional Determinants of Tuberculosis Treatment Completion in GIDA Communities: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

Jhomar Canu-og
University of Perpetual Help System DALTA, Las Piñas City, Philippines
Cyruz P. Tuppal
University of Perpetual Help System DALTA, Las Piñas City, Philippines; Institute of Nursing, University of Makati, Philippines; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Published 2026-08-07

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis,
  • Treatment Completion,
  • Community Health Workers,
  • DOTS,
  • Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas,
  • Philippines
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Canu-og, J., & P. Tuppal, C. (2026). Multidimensional Determinants of Tuberculosis Treatment Completion in GIDA Communities: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Celebes Nursing Journal, 3(2), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.70848/cnj.v3i2.73

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) treatment completion remains challenging in Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas (GIDAs), where geographic, social, and health-system barriers may disrupt continuity of care. Objective: This study examined individual, community, structural, and health-system factors associated with TB treatment completion in selected GIDA barangays of Pangantucan, Bukidnon, Philippines. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN → QUAL) was used. The quantitative phase combined retrospective review of treatment information with questionnaire data from 220 purposively selected participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable binary logistic regression. Open-ended qualitative responses from 25 participants were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and integrated during interpretation. Results: Greater CHW engagement (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.26–1.82), stronger family and social support (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17–1.76), and greater DOTS utilization (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.18–1.63) were associated with higher odds of treatment completion, whereas poorer transportation access was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60–0.94). The model showed good discrimination (AUC = .819) but suboptimal calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow χ² = 17.90, p = .012). Qualitative findings emphasized the roles of CHWs, family involvement, transportation barriers, financial constraints, stigma, and treatment-related concerns. Conclusion: TB treatment completion in GIDA communities is associated with interacting individual, community, structural, and health-system factors. Community-based follow-up, family-centered support, accessible DOTS services, and transportation assistance may strengthen treatment continuity.

References

  1. Afandi, A. T., Putri, P., & Rondhianto. (2026). Digital adherence and telemonitoring solutions in tuberculosis care: A scoping review of mHealth-driven management strategies. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtb.2026.04.016
  2. Ahson, M., Gaviola, D. M., O’Connor, S., Gutierrez, A., Apas, M., Eguia, M. A., Pacial, D. R., Zamora, A., Lacson, R., De Guzman, A., & Moonan, P. K. (2026). Evaluating tuberculosis surveillance using global standards and benchmarks in the Philippines: Mixed methods study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 12, e77058. https://doi.org/10.2196/77058
  3. Alipanah, N., Jarlsberg, L., Miller, C., Linh, N. N., Falzon, D., Jaramillo, E., & Nahid, P. (2018). Adherence interventions and outcomes of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), e1002595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002595
  4. Baba, D., & Atinga, B.-E. (2026). Tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries: A critical analysis of health system barriers and the promise of artificial intelligence. The Open Public Health Journal, 19, e18749445431680. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445431680260121064724
  5. Brubacher, L. J., Oga-Omenka, C., Beggs, B., Bustos, M., Heitkamp, P., Morita, P. P., & Dodd, W. (2026). Profiling digital technologies used to support the tuberculosis care cascade and their implementation across high-burden countries: A systematic scoping review. Digital Health, 12, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251410991
  6. Castillo, K. A. C., Orolfo, D. D. A., Desacada, J. A. B., Chua, P. G., Francia, M. R. M., & Manansala, F. M. B. (2026). Perceived quality of care and level of satisfaction of patients on tuberculosis directly observed therapy short-course during the postpandemic transition in a rural health unit in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Public Health Practice, 3(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/AJPHP.AJPHP_28_25
  7. Chang, J. H. H., & Ong, L. C. Y. (2026). Health-related quality of life and sociodemographic factors as predictors of treatment outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis patients in a tertiary hospital in Cebu City. Philippine Journal of Chest Diseases, 24(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.70172/pjcd.v23i2.13333
  8. Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2015). Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0697
  9. Department of Health. (2020a). Updated Philippine Strategic TB Elimination Plan 1: 2020–2023. https://ntp.doh.gov.ph/download/updated-philippine-strategic-tb-elimination-plan-1-2020-2023/
  10. Department of Health. (2020b). National Tuberculosis Control Program manual of procedures (6th ed.). Republic of the Philippines. https://ntp.doh.gov.ph/download/ntp-mop-6th-edition/
  11. Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
  12. Faye, L. M., Hosu, M. C. C., Dlatu, N., Iruedo, J., & Apalata, T. (2025). Predicting treatment adherence in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: Insights from socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors of patients in the rural Eastern Cape. Frontiers in Tuberculosis, 3, 1659333. https://doi.org/10.3389/ftubr.2025.1659333
  13. Gebremariam, M. K., Bjune, G. A., & Frich, J. C. (2010). Barriers and facilitators of adherence to tuberculosis treatment in patients on concomitant TB and HIV treatment: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 10, 651. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-651
  14. Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2015). Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass.
  15. Hamoy, G. L., Opina-Tan, L. A., Pamittan, K. G. A., Cedicol, N. C., Jumangit, A. C., III, & Perez, M. O., III. (2026). Barangay health workers’ perceived factors that affect performance in health service delivery in five upland municipalities of Cavite. Acta Medica Philippina, 60(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.10714
  16. Harrell, F. E., Jr. (2015). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
  17. Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Kim, D. (2008). Social capital and health. Springer.
  18. Leddy, A. M., Babirye, D., & Musinguzi, N. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to implementing a digital adherence technology for tuberculosis treatment supervision in Uganda: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e38828. https://doi.org/10.2196/38828
  19. Mohamoud, J. H. (2026). Improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Somalia: A narrative review of strategies, challenges, and policy recommendations. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S595510
  20. Munro, S. A., Lewin, S. A., Smith, H. J., Engel, M. E., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2007). Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Medicine, 4(7), e238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040238
  21. Nwamba, W. V., Okunola, A. O., Crowder, R., Christopher, D. J., Worodria, W., Yu, C., Palmer, Z., Ndlangalavu, G., Naidoo, D., Mitchell, E. M. H., Marx, F. M., Cattamanchi, A., & Theron, G. (2026). Sputum scarcity and associated factors in people undergoing tuberculosis testing in South Africa, Uganda, India, and the Philippines: An analysis of cross-sectional observational data. eClinicalMedicine, 95, 103977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103977
  22. Olupot, B., Namuwenge, P. M., Muttamba, W., Nansumba, M., Wambi, W., Kirenga, B., & Okot-Nwang, M. (2021). HIV infection modifies the relationship between distance to a health facility and tuberculosis treatment outcomes in rural eastern Uganda. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, 22, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100203
  23. Ridho, A., Alfian, S. D., van Boven, J. F. M., Levita, J., Yalcin, E. A., Le, L., Alffenaar, J.-W., Hak, E., Abdulah, R., & Pradipta, I. S. (2022). Digital health technologies to improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes in patients with tuberculosis: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), e33062. https://doi.org/10.2196/33062
  24. Riley, R. D., van der Windt, D., Croft, P., & Moons, K. G. M. (2019). Prognosis research in healthcare: Concepts, methods, and impact. Oxford University Press.
  25. Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., Pencina, M. J., & Kattan, M. W. (2010). Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology, 21(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2
  26. Suelan, L. D. E., Fajutagana, N. S., Ciño, K. C., Genzon, J. E., Corvera, C. B., Tomanan, K. J. L., & Taruc, A. G. (2026). Challenges and adaptations of TB-DOTS services during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Cotabato Province, Philippines: A mixed-methods study. Acta Medica Philippina, 60(5), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.13500
  27. Tanimura, T., Jaramillo, E., Weil, D., Raviglione, M., & Lönnroth, K. (2014). Financial burden for tuberculosis patients: A systematic review. European Respiratory Journal, 43(6), 1763–1775. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00193413
  28. Tao, Y., Zhao, J., Cui, H., Liang, Z., Li, J., Ren, J., & Zhu, H. (2026). Data-driven model analysis of the impact of environmental and socioeconomic factors on tuberculosis incidence. Infectious Disease Modelling, 11(3), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2026.02.002
  29. Tola, H. H., Tol, A., Shojaeizadeh, D., & Garmaroudi, G. (2016). Psychological and educational factors associated with tuberculosis treatment adherence. Patient Preference and Adherence, 10, 1977–1986. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S112056
  30. Van Calster, B., McLernon, D. J., van Smeden, M., Wynants, L., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2019). Calibration: The Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Medicine, 17, 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7
  31. von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Medicine, 4(10), e296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
  32. World Health Organization. (2021). Compendium of data and evidence-related tools for use in TB planning and programming. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022843
  33. World Health Organization. (2022). WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: Module 4: Treatment—tuberculosis care and support. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240047716
  34. World Health Organization. (2025). Global tuberculosis report 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116924
  35. Yassin, M. A., Rashid, A., & Wandwalo, E. (2026). Can we optimise the TB response amid funding constraints using evidence-based, cost-effective strategies? IJTLD Open, 3(4), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0771